# parlant vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | parlant | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #22 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 18 311 | 35 794 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +833 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.3.2 · 28 Apr 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 72/100 for parlant, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for parlant.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; parlant needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+833 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [parlant](https://selfhost.directory/project/parlant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/parlant.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/parlant-vs-seaweedfs