# parlant vs quackback

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | parlant | quackback |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 209 in AI Agents | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 18 311 ✓ | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.3.2 · 28 Apr 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

parlant scores 72/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for parlant.

If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; parlant needs more configuration.

parlant is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [parlant](https://selfhost.directory/project/parlant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/parlant.md)
- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/parlant-vs-quackback