# paperclip vs Wastebin

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | Wastebin |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 108 322 ✓ | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 498 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.

Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.

If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; paperclip needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 498 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [Wastebin](https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-wastebin