# paperclip vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 108 212 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 848 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; paperclip needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 848 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-transfersh