# paperclip vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 108 190 | 117 704 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 826 ✓ | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 826 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-tradingagents