# paperclip vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 108 406 ✓ | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 582 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 582 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-syncwatch