# paperclip vs SwizGuard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | SwizGuard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #46 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 108 352 ✓ | 232 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 528 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 42/100 for SwizGuard, so it is the safer default.

paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SwizGuard.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 528 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [SwizGuard](https://selfhost.directory/project/swizguard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/swizguard.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-swizguard