# paperclip vs swarm-cronjob

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | swarm-cronjob |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 108 237 ✓ | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 873 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.

paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for swarm-cronjob.

If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; paperclip needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 873 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [swarm-cronjob](https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/swarm-cronjob.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-swarm-cronjob