# paperclip vs supa-manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | supa-manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 35/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #39 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 108 285 ✓ | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 921 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 35/100 for supa-manager, so it is the safer default.

paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supa-manager.

If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; supa-manager needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 921 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [supa-manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/supa-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supa-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-supa-manager