paperclipvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| paperclip | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 108 406 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 582 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 39 |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.
If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 582 stars in 30 days).
paperclip details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep paperclip, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with