# paperclip vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 108 301 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 937 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.

If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+26 937 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-rudderstack