# paperclip vs Project OSRM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | paperclip | Project OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 108 406 ✓ | 8 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 582 ✓ | +74 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

paperclip scores 88/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.

Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for paperclip.

If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 582 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [paperclip](https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paperclip.md)
- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paperclip-vs-project-osrm