PanWatchvsSyslog-ng
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PanWatch | Syslog-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 2 281 | 2 386 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +130 | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.
PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Syslog-ng.
If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; Syslog-ng needs more configuration.
PanWatch is growing faster right now (+130 stars in 30 days).
PanWatch details →Syslog-ng details →
Swap a project
Keep PanWatch, compare it with
Keep Syslog-ng, compare it with