# PanWatch vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PanWatch | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Fintech | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 2 272 | 38 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 | +1 355 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 355 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/panwatch-vs-searxng