# pandaprobe vs sglang

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | pandaprobe | sglang |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #43 of 124 in AI | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 792 | 38 338 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 930 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 4 Oct 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sglang scores 86/100 against 51/100 for pandaprobe, so it is the safer default.

sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for pandaprobe.

If you want the quickest setup, pandaprobe is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.

sglang is growing faster right now (+1 930 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [pandaprobe](https://selfhost.directory/project/pandaprobe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pandaprobe.md)
- [sglang](https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sglang.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pandaprobe-vs-sglang