# PairDrop vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PairDrop | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 86 in File Sharing | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 11 713 | 29 389 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +254 ✓ | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 75/100 for PairDrop, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PairDrop.

If you want the quickest setup, PairDrop is easier to run; SRS needs more configuration.

PairDrop is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PairDrop](https://selfhost.directory/project/pairdrop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pairdrop.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/pairdrop-vs-srs