# PaddleOCR vs werbot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | werbot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #36 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 91 881 ✓ | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +440 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 36/100 for werbot, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for werbot.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; werbot needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+440 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [werbot](https://selfhost.directory/project/werbot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/werbot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-werbot