# PaddleOCR vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 91 912 ✓ | 154 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-transcriber