# PaddleOCR vs textsnap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | textsnap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 91 864 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +423 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.

If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+423 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [textsnap](https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-textsnap