# PaddleOCR vs subarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | subarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 91 901 ✓ | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +460 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v2.7.24 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.

subarr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+460 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [subarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/subarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-subarr