# PaddleOCR vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 91 869 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +428 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana