# PaddleOCR vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 91 931 ✓ | 11 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +490 ✓ | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+490 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-sonarqube