# PaddleOCR vs SandBase Harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | SandBase Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 91 938 ✓ | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +497 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.

SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [SandBase Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-sandbase-harness