# PaddleOCR vs rushdb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | rushdb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 91 938 ✓ | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +497 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.

rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [rushdb](https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rushdb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-rushdb