# PaddleOCR vs rpi-mqtt-monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | rpi-mqtt-monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 91 912 ✓ | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-rpi-mqtt-monitor