# PaddleOCR vs Rembg

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | Rembg |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 91 868 ✓ | 25 216 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +427 ✓ | +77 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 78/100 for Rembg, so it is the safer default.

Rembg ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.

If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+427 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [Rembg](https://selfhost.directory/project/rembg) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rembg.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-rembg