# PaddleOCR vs Questarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | Questarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 91 912 ✓ | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [Questarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-questarr