# PaddleOCR vs Qtap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | Qtap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 91 912 ✓ | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.

PaddleOCR ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [Qtap](https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qtap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-qtap