# PaddleOCR vs piclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | piclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #26 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 91 943 ✓ | 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +502 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v3.3.4 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 53/100 for piclaw, so it is the safer default.

piclaw ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.

If you want the quickest setup, piclaw is easier to run; PaddleOCR needs more configuration.

PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+502 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [piclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/piclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-piclaw