# PaddleOCR vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | PaddleOCR | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 91 931 ✓ | 61 824 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +490 | +1 482 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 84/100 for penpot, so it is the safer default.

penpot ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.

If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 482 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [PaddleOCR](https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/paddleocr.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/paddleocr-vs-penpot