# Owncast vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Owncast | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 11 632 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Owncast scores 73/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.

If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.

Owncast is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Owncast](https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/owncast-vs-qwc2