# Owncast vs QFieldCloud

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Owncast | QFieldCloud |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 11 632 ✓ | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Owncast scores 73/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.

QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.

If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.

Owncast is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Owncast](https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast.md)
- [QFieldCloud](https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qfieldcloud.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/owncast-vs-qfieldcloud