# Otari vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Otari | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 39 in API Gateway | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 758 | 47 726 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +19 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.34.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 56/100 for Otari, so it is the safer default.

Otari ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Otari needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+19 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Otari](https://selfhost.directory/project/otari) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/otari.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/otari-vs-text-generation-webui