OtarivsShields
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Otari | Shields | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 39 in API Gateway | #6 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 752 | 27 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +125 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.33.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Shields scores 80/100 against 56/100 for Otari, so it is the safer default.
Otari ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Shields.
If you want the quickest setup, Shields is easier to run; Otari needs more configuration.
Shields is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).
Otari details →Shields details →
Swap a project
Keep Otari, compare it with
Keep Shields, compare it with