# Otari vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Otari | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #14 of 39 in API Gateway | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 749 | 1 033 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.33.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 56/100 for Otari, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Otari.

If you want the quickest setup, Otari is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Otari](https://selfhost.directory/project/otari) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/otari.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/otari-vs-readmeabook