# OSEM vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OSEM | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Event Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 929 | 17 187 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.

Upptime is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OSEM](https://selfhost.directory/project/osem) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/osem.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/osem-vs-upptime