# OSEM vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OSEM | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Event Management | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 929 | 11 045 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

unopim scores 69/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OSEM.

If you want the quickest setup, unopim is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.

unopim is growing faster right now (+48 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OSEM](https://selfhost.directory/project/osem) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/osem.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/osem-vs-unopim