OSEMvssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OSEM | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Event Management | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 929 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
OSEM details →sdnext details →