# OSEM vs quackback

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OSEM | quackback |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 50/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Event Management | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 929 ✓ | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

quackback scores 50/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.

quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OSEM.

If you want the quickest setup, quackback is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [OSEM](https://selfhost.directory/project/osem) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/osem.md)
- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/osem-vs-quackback