# OSEM vs qdrant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OSEM | qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Event Management | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 929 | 35 307 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +504 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

qdrant scores 82/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.

qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OSEM.

If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.

qdrant is growing faster right now (+504 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OSEM](https://selfhost.directory/project/osem) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/osem.md)
- [qdrant](https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qdrant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/osem-vs-qdrant