# OSEM vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OSEM | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 11 in Event Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 929 | 61 546 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +484 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 47/100 for OSEM, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OSEM.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; OSEM needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+484 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OSEM](https://selfhost.directory/project/osem) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/osem.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/osem-vs-pi-hole