# ibl.ai/os vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ibl.ai/os | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #65 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 793 | 78 743 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 019 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

ibl.ai/os ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, unsloth is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 019 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/os-2-vs-unsloth