# ibl.ai/os vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ibl.ai/os | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #65 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 793 | 13 312 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

ibl.ai/os ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+302 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/os-2-vs-stash