# ibl.ai/os vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ibl.ai/os | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #65 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 793 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

ibl.ai/os ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/os-2-vs-sdnext