# Orca vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 108 555 ✓ | 89 701 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 648 ✓ | +2 412 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 86/100 for World Monitor, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+8 648 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-world-monitor