# Orca vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 108 642 ✓ | 93 027 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 735 ✓ | +1 280 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 88/100 for uptime-kuma, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.

Orca is growing faster right now (+8 735 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-uptime-kuma