# Orca vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 109 453 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 546 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 546 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-trip2g