# Orca vs spotify-saver

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | spotify-saver |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 109 676 ✓ | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 769 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 0.7.5 · 23 Nov 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 44/100 for spotify-saver, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for spotify-saver.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; spotify-saver needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 769 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [spotify-saver](https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/spotify-saver.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-spotify-saver