# Orca vs speedtest-rust

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | speedtest-rust |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 109 139 ✓ | 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 232 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 45/100 for speedtest-rust, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for speedtest-rust.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; speedtest-rust needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 232 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [speedtest-rust](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-rust.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-speedtest-rust