# Orca vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Orca | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 108 898 ✓ | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 991 ✓ | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 81/100 for SeaweedFS, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+8 991 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/orca-vs-seaweedfs